#Pixel 3 borderlands 3 images movie#
#Pixel 3 borderlands 3 images Pc#

READ NEXT: Take movie night anywhere with these portable projectors Acer Predator GD711 review: Design Crucially, it’s the only projector of the three with VRR onboard. Of course, the LED light source in the Predator has one advantage: a lifespan of up to 30,000 hours compared to the 4,000 to 8,000 hours you’ll get from the other two models. Meanwhile, both go brighter than the Acer, with outputs of up to 4,000 and 3,200 ANSI Lumens respectively thanks to their more conventional Metal Halide lamps. The BenQ supports refresh rates of up to 120Hz at 1080p, while the Optoma matches the GD711 at 240Hz. Both have the same resolution, the same pixel shifting tech and both support HDR10. While we’ve seen a few 4K projectors that happen to be good for games, the Predator GD711’s biggest rivals are the Optoma UHD38 ( £1,069) and the BenQ TK700 ( £1,199). READ NEXT: Our pick of the best projectors for every set-up Acer Predator GD711 review: Price and competition We’ve seen monitors and TVs with VRR onboard, but this is the first gaming projector to include it.

#Pixel 3 borderlands 3 images Pc#

Supported on PC and by the PS5 and Xbox Series S/X consoles, this tech synchronises frame rates between the GPU on your games machine and the projector to avoid unsightly screen tearing and frame stuttering effects. 709 colour standard and – most excitingly – support for Variable Refresh Rate (VRR). Otherwise, we’re promised 125% coverage of the Rec. It’s a technique we’ve seen several times before, and it’s near-impossible to tell a pixel shifted 4K image from the real deal.Īcer promises an output of up to 4,000 lumens from the RGB LED light source, though these turn out to be LED lumens rather than the standard ANSI lumens, where Acer claims just 1,450. Like most 4K projectors at this price point, the DLP chip doesn’t run at a native 4K resolution, but uses pixel shifting tech to simulate it. The Predator GD711 is a 4K DLP projector with support for HDR10 and refresh rates of up to 120Hz on console and 240Hz on PC. The new GD7110 brings both together in a projector with a powerful set of specialist gaming features, one of which we haven’t seen before on any gaming model.Īcer Predator GD711 review: What you need to know Its Predator line of gaming PCs and peripherals is one of the oldest and best established, and while it’s not such a major name in the projector market, it has still produced some very respectable offerings. Asus, Samsung and LG all make fantastic gaming monitors and good or great projectors, yet we’ve never seen a gaming projector from any of these companies.Īcer, however, has jumped on the bandwagon. And with no real inherent risk like there is for CSAM there'd be no reason for people not to try tweaking things until they got it past the hash.While the likes of BenQ, VIewsonic and Optoma have spotted that there’s a market for big screen gaming at 4K resolutions, it’s curious that manufacturers with more of a gaming heritage have taken so long to catch up. And there'd still be the strong possibility that even pretty small changes could defeat the system. So it's not the sort of thing any particular company could really realistically do on its own, it'd have to be a government thing. There'd need to be a whole system for proving 'ownership' (or whatever you want to call the right to request the images be removed) and then flagging for each individual image then some kind of centralized database that would store all those images (or at least their hashes) for comparison that every major company would have to be required to use. It's not impossible you could have a similar system for takedown requests but there'd be a lot of work involved re: getting images into the system. And even if it did, there's a knowledge issue - how do the people involved even necessarily know that the images they have are illegal or even on some kind of list for images that the people depicted don't want circulating? You can't tell by just looking at them like you can with CSAM. Someone may not want their images on the internet but that doesn't make the images themselves illegal to own. Which doesn't really apply to other images. The reason they have those systems is less to stop images being posted per se and more to try to identify and punish the image holders. And the thing about CSAM is that the images themselves are illegal - whether the originals or the manipulated copies - so that makes things a lot easier re: enforcement. cropped or with changed resolution), but I'm not sure how much it really lives up to its own hype. Apple claims to have a CSAM hash technique that produces identical hashes for even manipulated images (i.e.